Domestic Construction Disputes

Vaughan Constructions

Vaughan Constructions Pty Ltd v Melbourne Water Corporation: Is VCAT a court under the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) Part IV?

Case citation: Vaughan Constructions Pty Ltd v Melbourne Water Corporation [2022] VCAT 633 Case Note Facts On 19 October 2018, Biodiversity entered into a contract with Vaughan for the construction of a building on land in Epping owned by KV Cooper Pty Ltd and Drakon Investments Pty Ltd. On the same day, Biodiversity entered into […]

Vaughan Constructions Pty Ltd v Melbourne Water Corporation: Is VCAT a court under the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) Part IV? Read More »

Submission To Parliamentary

Submission to Parliamentary Inquiry into Payments to Subcontractors

Background to Inquiry and Submission A submission to an inquiry headed by the Legislative Assembly Environment and Planning Committee, Victoria, has been made by Harriet Warlow-Shill, founder and principal of Warlows Legal. This inquiry relates to employers and contractors who refuse to pay their subcontractors for completed works. The Committee will examine the mechanisms currently

Submission to Parliamentary Inquiry into Payments to Subcontractors Read More »

Reforming Vcat

Reforming VCAT: Addressing Delays in Building Dispute Resolutions

Reforming VCAT: Addressing Delays in Building Dispute Resolutions Did you know that the median time to resolve a building dispute in Victoria now stands at an alarming three years? This is one of the many challenges currently facing the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), Victoria’s principal forum for resolving domestic construction disputes. The complexity

Reforming VCAT: Addressing Delays in Building Dispute Resolutions Read More »

Harmerarchitecture Workplace Vcatoakleighcourtservicesvictoria Courtroom 1

Outside VCAT’s jurisdiction

Recent decisions have raised concerns about VCAT and its viability as an effective forum for domestic building dispute resolution. get in touch Warlows is part of the 1% PLEDGEWarlows are now members of HOPE NOW’s mission VCAT was established to provide fair, efficient and affordable justice to the Victorian community. Recent decisions such as Thurin

Outside VCAT’s jurisdiction Read More »

Builder Looking Up

Do you Have to Make Progress Payments to Your Builder? A Recent Supreme Court Clarification. 

Victorian law requires progress payments to builders on commercial projects. Recent case clarifies exemptions for mixed-use developments with domestic building work. get in touch Warlows is part of the 1% PLEDGEWarlows are now members of HOPE NOW’s mission In the context of large, commercial developments, Victorian law has implemented protections for builders wherein the owner

Do you Have to Make Progress Payments to Your Builder? A Recent Supreme Court Clarification.  Read More »

The Curtailing Of Vcat’s Powers And The Victorian Consumer

The Curtailing of VCAT’s Powers and the Victorian Consumer

get in touch Warlows is part of the 1% PLEDGEWarlows are now members of HOPE NOW’s mission ‘Fair, efficient and affordable justice for the Victorian community’. The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal has been a staple of Victoria’s legal system for over two decades, providing applicants with expedient access to justice without the need for

The Curtailing of VCAT’s Powers and the Victorian Consumer Read More »

Construction Progress Payments – High Court Upholds Adjudicator’s Determination

Construction Progress Payments – High Court Upholds Adjudicator’s Determination

The High Court in Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd [2018] HCA 4 has finally laid to rest a longstanding dispute over the finality of an adjudicator’s determination under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 NSW (SOP Act). The SOP Act, which has parallel legislation in all

Construction Progress Payments – High Court Upholds Adjudicator’s Determination Read More »

County Court

County Court Raises the Question – Is It Time for a Review of Resourcing for Domestic Building Disputes?

In Impresa Construction v Oxford Building [2021] VCC 1146, Judge Burchell of the Victorian County Court considered whether there was a “Domestic Building Dispute” where a stay must be made under section 57 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic) (‘the Act’) and proceedings referred to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). Judge Burchell held to not

County Court Raises the Question – Is It Time for a Review of Resourcing for Domestic Building Disputes? Read More »

Scroll to Top