Do you Have to Make Progress Payments to Your Builder? A Recent Supreme Court Clarification.
Victorian law requires progress payments to builders on commercial projects. Recent case clarifies exemptions for mixed-use developments with domestic building work.
In the context of large, commercial developments, Victorian law has implemented protections for builders wherein the owner of the site is required to make ‘progress payments’: to pay the builder progressively for their work. Since its passing in 2002, the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002, has awarded the right to builders to make claims to their contractors for payments of work completed under a building contract up to the present time. These are payments whose schedule can be agreed by contract, but if it is agreed by contract, the builder is entitled to payment after a statutory period of time.
The law is intended to enshrine the terms of payment which bind commercial, high-value building developments.
For this reason it is important to know whether the Security of Payment Act applies to you, if you are a developer.
The case of Piastrino v Seascape Constructions provides clarification as to whether builders who are constructing mixed use developments, which involve both commercial and domestic building work, are required to make progress payments to the builder. In October 2017, Mr Piastrino entered into a contract with Seascape Constructions to construct a building comprising both apartments and shops. Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002, the developer of a residential building is not required to make progress payments to the builder. Therefore, the primary question put to the court was whether this exemption would also apply to mixed use developments.
The Court found that the exemption could apply to mixed use developments that include domestic building work. However, in this particular case, the Piastrinos were found to be ‘in the business of building residences’, and so the exemption did not apply.
The decision in Piastrino v Seascape ultimately provides a clear authority on the application of the exemption to progress payments. It is important for property owners to note that the exemption is only partial and will not apply if they are found to be ‘in the business of building residences’. For builders, the decision reinforces the risk of failing to identify separately any domestic building work from other work in a contract, as required under section 12 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995.
You may also be interested in
Client Testimonials
EXCELLENT Based on 36 reviews Posted on Ethan Dehghan2025-09-14Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I had an excellent experience with Sajad Alobaidi when buying my house. He explained the contract clearly, was always responsive, and made the whole process smooth and stress-free. Highly recommend Warlows Legal and Sajad for property purchases! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Posted on Zahra Ahmadi2025-09-10Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. One of the best lawyers and his team they are very supportive and very helpful and when it comes to doing the job they do it 100% without any delays Thank you so much to Sam and Sajad for everythingPosted on Arie Kliger2025-03-12Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Thanks to Roni Margolin for very professional legal services. Roni performed at high standard representing me in negotiations and court proceedings. She exhibited knowledge, experience and commitment. She kept me informed and discussed matters with me regularly. Warlow Legal have provided me with professional services and I highly recommend them.Posted on Hus Melbourne Best2025-02-17Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dealing with the team is easy and response is quick and efficient. They are reasonable with prices and seems very reasonable to the clients. Have a building matter as a Builder and they helping very smartly. Great full to Harriet for taking matter with interest and helping with care. F HussainPosted on Avi Bendetsky2024-12-09Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great firm highly recommend them!!Posted on Rivky Cyrulnik2024-11-22Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Thanks Harriet for your help and advice with our build. I am so happy I listened to you. It was a difficult dilemma but well worth following the advice in the long run. Spot on advice. Also thanks to Yoni for his help with our contract. Warlows has great experience with building law and contracts Thank you!Posted on Miriam Pacanowski2024-09-09Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Harriet and her team really cared about our charity and helped us through the many steps required to enable us to achieve DGR status. They were professional and responsive and achieved a fantastic outcome.Posted on Lazer Toggos2024-03-07Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Harriett and Caroline were very professional and listened very carefully They showed understanding and compassion I could not rate them higher Their work was excellent and went the extra mile Would highly recommendPosted on Schneier Lange2023-11-02Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Harriet and her team are very professional and personable and easy to deal with. They go the extra mile to get the job done and showed great care for a positive result. Recommend to anyone wanting a good experience.Posted on Yossi Friedman2023-09-26Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Harriet and her team have been so generous in their advice and support of my new venture and I am so grateful for all their assistance